問(wen) 想咨詢一下(xia)，單位未按照勞動(dong)合同(tong)約定(ding)提供勞動(dong)保護或(huo)者勞動(dong)條件的怎么(me)辦？

答 根據《勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)合同(tong)法》第38條規定，單(dan)(dan)位未(wei)按照勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)合同(tong)約(yue)定提(ti)供勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)保護或者(zhe)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)條件(jian)的(de)(de)，勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)者(zhe)可(ke)以(yi)(yi)解除勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)合同(tong)。如果單(dan)(dan)位安排勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)者(zhe)工(gong)作(zuo)的(de)(de)環境和(he)工(gong)作(zuo)條件(jian)惡(e)劣，存在安全(quan)隱(yin)患或漏洞，有可(ke)能給勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)者(zhe)的(de)(de)安全(quan)帶來威脅；或者(zhe)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)者(zhe)的(de)(de)工(gong)作(zuo)環境與勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)合同(tong)約(yue)定的(de)(de)內(nei)容不符，勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)者(zhe)都可(ke)以(yi)(yi)以(yi)(yi)此(ci)理由(you)提(ti)出解除勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)合同(tong)。用(yong)人單(dan)(dan)位隨意(yi)強行給員工(gong)“放假”或“停(ting)工(gong)”，無疑剝奪了(le)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)者(zhe)的(de)(de)工(gong)作(zuo)權利，讓勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)者(zhe)失去賴以(yi)(yi)工(gong)作(zuo)的(de)(de)基本條件(jian)，因此(ci)可(ke)視為未(wei)提(ti)供勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)(dong)條件(jian)。