問 想(xiang)了(le)解一(yi)下就業協議和勞(lao)動合同(tong)一(yi)樣嗎(ma)？如(ru)果不一(yi)樣，它們之間有哪些區別(bie)？

答 就(jiu)(jiu)業(ye)協(xie)(xie)議(yi)和勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)合同(tong)(tong)是(shi)(shi)不(bu)一樣的(de)。主(zhu)要區別表(biao)現(xian)在(zai)：(1)主(zhu)體不(bu)同(tong)(tong)。就(jiu)(jiu)業(ye)協(xie)(xie)議(yi)應用(yong)(yong)(yong)(yong)于(yu)畢(bi)(bi)(bi)業(ye)生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)與(yu)用(yong)(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)單(dan)位、學(xue)校三方(fang)面之間(jian)；而(er)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)合同(tong)(tong)只適合于(yu)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)者（畢(bi)(bi)(bi)業(ye)生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)）與(yu)用(yong)(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)單(dan)位之間(jian)，與(yu)學(xue)校無關；(2)內容不(bu)同(tong)(tong)。就(jiu)(jiu)業(ye)協(xie)(xie)議(yi)書(shu)的(de)主(zhu)要內容是(shi)(shi)畢(bi)(bi)(bi)業(ye)生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)介紹自(zi)身情況，并表(biao)示(shi)愿(yuan)(yuan)意(yi)(yi)到用(yong)(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)單(dan)位就(jiu)(jiu)業(ye)，用(yong)(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)單(dan)位表(biao)示(shi)愿(yuan)(yuan)意(yi)(yi)接收畢(bi)(bi)(bi)業(ye)生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)，學(xue)校同(tong)(tong)意(yi)(yi)推薦(jian)畢(bi)(bi)(bi)業(ye)生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)并列(lie)入就(jiu)(jiu)業(ye)方(fang)案；而(er)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)合同(tong)(tong)涉及的(de)主(zhu)要內容是(shi)(shi)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)權(quan)利和義(yi)務的(de)具(ju)體條款；(3)時間(jian)不(bu)同(tong)(tong)。一般來說(shuo)就(jiu)(jiu)業(ye)協(xie)(xie)議(yi)簽訂(ding)在(zai)前，就(jiu)(jiu)業(ye)協(xie)(xie)議(yi)應在(zai)畢(bi)(bi)(bi)業(ye)生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)就(jiu)(jiu)業(ye)之前簽訂(ding)，而(er)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)合同(tong)(tong)往往在(zai)畢(bi)(bi)(bi)業(ye)生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)到用(yong)(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)單(dan)位報(bao)到后才(cai)簽訂(ding)；(4)就(jiu)(jiu)業(ye)協(xie)(xie)議(yi)明確畢(bi)(bi)(bi)業(ye)生(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)(sheng)到用(yong)(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)單(dan)位工作的(de)意(yi)(yi)向，并不(bu)具(ju)有(you)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)合同(tong)(tong)確定雙方(fang)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)關系的(de)功(gong)能(neng)。