問 想了(le)解一(yi)下就業協議(yi)和勞動合同一(yi)樣嗎？如果不一(yi)樣，它們之(zhi)間(jian)有哪些區別？

答 就業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)協(xie)議(yi)和勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)合同(tong)(tong)(tong)是(shi)不(bu)一(yi)樣的。主(zhu)(zhu)要(yao)區別表現在：(1)主(zhu)(zhu)體不(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)。就業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)協(xie)議(yi)應(ying)(ying)用(yong)(yong)于(yu)畢(bi)業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)生(sheng)與用(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)位、學(xue)(xue)校(xiao)(xiao)三方(fang)(fang)面之(zhi)間；而勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)合同(tong)(tong)(tong)只適合于(yu)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)者（畢(bi)業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)生(sheng)）與用(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)位之(zhi)間，與學(xue)(xue)校(xiao)(xiao)無關(guan)；(2)內(nei)容不(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)。就業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)協(xie)議(yi)書的主(zhu)(zhu)要(yao)內(nei)容是(shi)畢(bi)業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)生(sheng)介紹自身情況(kuang)，并表示(shi)愿意(yi)(yi)到用(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)位就業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)，用(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)位表示(shi)愿意(yi)(yi)接(jie)收畢(bi)業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)生(sheng)，學(xue)(xue)校(xiao)(xiao)同(tong)(tong)(tong)意(yi)(yi)推薦(jian)畢(bi)業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)生(sheng)并列入(ru)就業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)方(fang)(fang)案；而勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)合同(tong)(tong)(tong)涉(she)及的主(zhu)(zhu)要(yao)內(nei)容是(shi)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)權利(li)和義務(wu)的具體條款；(3)時(shi)間不(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)。一(yi)般來說就業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)協(xie)議(yi)簽訂在前(qian)，就業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)協(xie)議(yi)應(ying)(ying)在畢(bi)業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)生(sheng)就業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)之(zhi)前(qian)簽訂，而勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)合同(tong)(tong)(tong)往往在畢(bi)業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)生(sheng)到用(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)位報(bao)到后才簽訂；(4)就業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)協(xie)議(yi)明確畢(bi)業(ye)(ye)(ye)(ye)生(sheng)到用(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)位工(gong)作的意(yi)(yi)向，并不(bu)具有(you)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)合同(tong)(tong)(tong)確定雙方(fang)(fang)勞(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)(dong)關(guan)系的功能(neng)。